題名:當社工碰到濟公─社會工作員將民間信仰視為社會資源之初探
推薦分享
資源連結
連結到原始資料 (您即將開啟新視窗離開本站)後設資料
- 資料類型：
- 來源資料庫:學位論文
- 著作者：
- 創作者名稱:吳怡蓉
- 主題與關鍵字：
- 主要分類:民俗傳說
- 中文關鍵詞:臺灣
- 中文關鍵詞:民間傳說
- 中文關鍵詞:社會工作
- 中文關鍵詞:民間信仰
- 中文關鍵詞:社會資源
- 中文關鍵詞:多元文化
- 外文關鍵詞:Taiwan
- 外文關鍵詞:Multi-Cultures
- 外文關鍵詞:Social Resources
- 外文關鍵詞:Folk Beliefs
- 外文關鍵詞:Social Work
- 描述：
- 頁碼:280
- 中文摘要:本篇論文起源於研究者感受到社會工作專業與自己所熟悉的民間信仰之間存有著不對等的關係，也因為如此不平等關係，引發了研究者一些困惑，且試圖以社會資源觀點將社會工作與民間信仰擺放於同一層次上，以探究兩者的關係。 研究過程中，研究者藉由虛擬案例式的訪談大綱，訪問社工員在其生命脈絡裡所認識的民間信仰、就專業位置看待民間信仰的觀點，以及專業教育養成中與民間信仰的接觸經驗等面向，以瞭解社工員在不同位置上對於民間信仰的看法與態度。由於本研究採以詮釋學的研究典範，在蒐集豐富的資料後，研究者以「敘說分析」(narrativeanalysis)之方式來進行，並透過辯證、對話，以及本身反思的過程，呈現其對現象的理解與詮釋。 透過研究發現引發研究者思考到以下的議題：一、民間信仰「文化」化。二、溫和式的專業本位。三、社會工作專業與生活經驗間的斷裂感。四、社會工作、基督教及民間信仰間的糾葛關係。五、宗教拿專業來包裝。藉由上述的討論，研究者嘗試將自己對於社會工作將民間信仰納入資源的想法，就民間信仰的存在價值、以「社會資源」定位民間信仰、以多元角度探討社會工作與民間信仰的關係性、跨越「專業本位」走向「互為主體性」的地位結構，及落實專業教育與實務中探討民間信仰議題，以深化本土性的社會工作等層面逐一說明。 本研究中的另一個重要關鍵為研究者立場的轉換部分，在研究的中後期，研究者重新檢視自己的立場，發現到研究者原先觀點的鬆動，是深受自己採取看待社會工作和民間信仰關係的不同位置而有所影響，且與自己本身以求和為主的思考脈絡息息相關。然而研究過後，研究者對於本篇論文的新立場與觀點為，社會工作與民間信仰之間合作關係與合作機制的建立，必須立基於兩者互為主體且互為資源的前提之下，才有更多的發展空間。
- 英文摘要:The motivation begins from the existed unequal relationship the researcher senses between the professional social work and the familiar folk beliefs. Because of this inequality, there are some perplexities caused by the researcher. The researcher will take the viewpoint of social resources to discuss the relationship between social work and the folk beliefs. During the researching process, the researcher used virtualized case-based interview outlines to understand social workers’ opinions and attitudes about folk beliefs in different positions. These positions include the known folk beliefs in social workers’lives, the outlooks on folk beliefs in their professional place and the experiences they have contacted folk beliefs during the process of their professional education. The research is based on the paradigm and criteria of hermeneutics. After collecting abundant materials and data, the researcher prudently adopts “narrative analysis” to proceed. Through dialectics, dialogues and self-reflection, the study represents the researcher’s understanding and interpretation of phenomenon. Through the study, the researcher is inspired to attain issues to discuss below: First, the “cultured” folk beliefs. Second, the “moderate”professional basis. Third, the discontinuity between professional social work and life experiences. Fourth, the complicated and entangled relationship among social work, Christianity, and folk beliefs. Fifth, disguised religions as profession. Through the discussions above, the researcher commits her thoughts toward social work adopting folk beliefs into social resources. These thoughts can be stated into five dimensions below: First, the existing value of folk beliefs. Second, orientating folk beliefs by social resources. Third, the relationship between social work and folk beliefs in multiple perspectives. Forth, the structure of caste from “professional basis” to “intersubjectivity”. Fifth, the discussion of folk beliefs in professional educations and practical applications to localize social work. Another key point is the researcher’s shifted position. In the later part of the study, the researcher re-examined her own stance and found her original perspective chageable. This change is influenced by the different positions the researcher takes toward social work and folk beliefs, and by the researcher’s thoughts of pursuing balance. After the study, the researcher takes the new stance and attitude about this thesis is that the establishment of cooperative relationship and patterns between social work and folk beliefs is based on the presupposition of intersubjectivity and interdependence for both. Therefore, there is the chance to make more development.
- 出版者：
- 主要出版者:東吳大學社會工作學系
- 出版地:臺北市
- 日期：
- 出版日期:2004
- 語言：
- 語文:中文
- 管理權：
- 典藏單位:國家圖書館
授權聯絡窗口
- 圖文授權請逕洽出版者或作者。 資料庫相關問題請洽國家圖書館知識服務組 ref@ncl.edu.tw
